Cylon-Knight, on 13 September 2010 - 09:11 PM, said:
Members can specifically post about a single episode in those threads if they want. When referring to three episodes at once don't post 3 identical posts (repeat the post in each episode's thread) - two of the identical posts would probably be moderated / deleted.
Sweeping comparisons are better left this (or one of the other) "generic" G1980 threads.
There is no need to spiral into insanity as G1980 did
... and have the boards full of crazy identical posts.
Sweeping comparisons are better left this (or one of the other) "generic" G1980 threads.
There is no need to spiral into insanity as G1980 did
I was going to say all that; but then I realized I'd be double posting!
As for episode recaps, that is not my aim with this thread; my point was to try to re-evaluate the series; not reboot/remake it, or point out all of it's flaws (we have a ton of threads for all of that), or nit-pick it's technical stuff (useless in this kind of show anyway), but my goal was to ask; is there anything in G1980 that can be re-evaluated as 'good' after so many (including myself) seemed to think it's just irredeemable garbage? In attempting to answer that, I revisited some of the episodes and I was a little surprised that once I scraped off the burnt-on cheese layer, I found some interesting bits here and there. So, I think my posts about certain points in specific episodes spoke for themselves.
I mean, I suppose there's good things in a garbage dumpster, if you know where and what to look for...
One of the things about G1980 that (IMO) bore reconsideration was it's attempt to insert some educational value into it's episodes for it's younger viewers (who would theoretically be watching at it's then-7 pm timeslot). Frankly, I find that commendable (even though the show was a disaster in so many other ways).
Not a lot of TV shows (certainly not reality shows) offer any real substance to young people these days, and that's kind of sad...
Also, once I went through them a little more, I found them (burnt cheese and all) to be wildly entertaining. So silly, as to be high-camp. So, maybe I was wrong in my early slams of the show; yes, it stunk as a sequel to it's superior parent show, but on it's own terms as camp, lightweight fluff?
It kind of works in a perverse way...
Once again; CK is right, the little bugger!

Sign In »
Register Now!
Help
Add Reply




MultiQuote













