dsgtdave, on 07 December 2010 - 09:04 AM, said:
Kind of a tight knit circle isn't it? I don't really have an opinion on it yet. Only time will tell.
I may be jumping the gun to be concerned by that, but I worry that "Rick Berman's disease" may encroach; RB's disease is my name for the entropy effect caused by having the same, homogenous production crew work on the same show for too long. RB ran Star Trek for almost two decades (four series and four movies; that's a lot of product). In the early days, RB Trek was kind of coltish; then after a few seasons of experience, his vision of Star Trek came into it's own. It did really well for awhile, but towards the end of the 18 yr run a bland, generic 'sameness' began to creep in. Recycled plots, boring, generic music, even the
look of the shows (dull, bright lighting, clean, super-stable camerawork, etc) all seemed to blur together a bit.
Given that "Caprica" was not exactly a resounding success, I am concerned that a production team consisting of mostly the same people (and directors) will yield a similar result. Not that "Caprica" was bad, really; I just kind of see it as a 'failed experiment' to do a soap opera within the BSG universe. I think some new people; people from
outside the BSG zone might do really well for the show, just as JJ Abrams did in 2009 for Star Trek (and also the combined team of Harve Bennett and Nick Meyer back in 1982, when they made ST2: The Wrath of Khan; a 180 departure from the plodding, less lively ST-TMP).